Feminism
In this shot we see
a medium close up of Sam grabbing Norman, who is dressed as his mother, from
behind. We see Norman struggling and screaming while holding a knife. Sam is
grabbing Norman's arm to prevent him from swinging the knife, he has a
agonising look on his face. In the background various items from the fruit
cellar are located. We can see directly behind them the cellar's door, which is
open due to Lila walking in prior to this shot.
We hear a constant
high pitch major key screeching of stringed instruments. This music is also
used in a previous scene with a similar action taking place, in which we're
meant to feel suspense. The music created is repeated in quick succession which
transitions to the music in this exact shot which is a minor key and slower
paced sound of the same stringed instruments. They play two notable notes and
with each stroke they keep the same tempo but the notes change slightly in
pitch. We also hear the diegetic scream
saying "I'm Norma Bates". We also hear other diegetic sounds of Sam
& Norman's footsteps as Norman attempts to kill Lila, with Sam quickly
stopping him.
At first these
elements come together to create a frightening and suspense filled emotion.
However, as Sam rescues Lila these elements form a sense of relief. When we see
Norman dressed as his mother holding a knife it shocks the audience as we have
recently been associating with Lila in the previous scenes. We now know that
Norman has killed multiple people before therefore we feel frightened towards
him. As he approaches the suspense quick builds but this is quickly stopped
when Sam enters. When Sam grabs Norman preventing him from attacking Lila we
feel a sense of relief, as Lila does, as Lila is now safe from the killer. The
music in this scene works to help intensify the emotions the shots are
establishing. When we hear the same high pitched music from the shower scene in
which Marion was murdered, our feelings are heightened as we are lead to belief
Lila might suffer the same fate as Marion. The diegetic sound of footsteps
approaching adds to this giving the feeling off the killer approaching. In the
particular shot we are hearing the slower paced and minor key music. It was
important to state the previous music heard as this new tune is reminiscent of
it. The music works to build a sense of relief as the previous music slows down
and begins to break down. We feel the sense of relief as the previous feelings
of suspense fade away along with the music which is helping to accomplish this.
Once we've seen the
entire film we learn of how Norman was under the control of his idea of his
mother, he was a dangerous and almost unstoppable killer. Knowing this our we
know we were right to feel frightened of Norman. As had Sam not been there to
save Lila, Norman would've surely killed her.
Knowing this
sexist/misogynistic ideas and themes are developed here that Hitchcock
developed and were also common in films
of the 1960's era, in America, and prior. These are that women need a man to be
saved and that women make life more difficult. We see that had Sam not been
there to stop Norman, Lila would've likely suffered a unfortunate fate. Also
prior to this scene and also within this scene we see Lila's curiosity putting
both her and Sam at risk, causing the audience to question if the scene
would've played out very differently had Lila just stuck with Sam.
Hitchcock intended
to convince the audience of these ideas, and in the era of when this film was
released he was successful in his intention. This is because firstly we are
left feeling a sense of relief as Sam has saved Lila, as by herself we are led
to assume she would've suffered the same fate due to the repeated music from
Marion's death scene. However, when the closing music of this scene begins Lila
is alive as she'd been saved by a man. As the scene closes we the music works
to remind the audience of Marion's fate, the key difference being having a man
to save Lila. Therefore we are further convinced to believing in this
misogynistic idea, meaning Hitchcock was indeed successful with this idea.
Hitchcock was also successful in convincing audiences of his other idea, that
women make more life difficult. In this particular shot we see Sam had to
protect not only himself but also Lila, as she couldn't. Prior to this entire
scene we see Lila insist on coming to the motel with Sam, Hitchcock leads the
audience to believe had she done what Sam said this entire situation could've
been avoided. The audience thinking this shows evidence of how Hitchcock
convinces the audience that Lila had made this scenario more difficult for Sam.
It is important to
note that one strong external factor for why Hitchcock was successful in his
sexist intentions in this shot is due to the era in which this film was
released. In 1960's America, where/when this film was released, the majority of
society was sexist towards women and treated them such as second-class
citizens. Compared to today where, while it may not be perfect/completely fair
yet, women and men live much more equal lives and sexist views a not
encouraged/socially acceptable.
In the
wider context this film had a strong impact on society as a whole. Hitchcock is
well-known to unfairly treat his female cast as well having a sexist view of
women as a whole. He doesn't outright hate females as he's been quoted saying
"I don't exactly hate women, but I certainly don't think they are as good
as men as actors."(From <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/books/article-1024720/A-Psycho-Birds-SPELLBOUND-BY-BEAUTY-Donald-Spoto.html> ). The ideas
that Hitchcock tries to convince audiences of represent how most of society of
the time viewed women. It shows that Hitchcock shared his beliefs with general
society. This made his intentions easier to succeed in, as most of his audience
shared his beliefs. However, in today's society he is seen as a man with sexist
beliefs. While this may be true Hitchcock wasn't entirely sexist towards women.
In the wider film we see the main characters/protagonists of the film were
females. Not only that but strong and independent ones. Part of doing this was
to help set-up the idea that women need a man to be saved. As Hitchcock showed
the consequences of women wanting to be independent. However, despite that
Hitchcock challenged general society's view of women of the time. He created
characters that challenged many beliefs, showing that women can be independent
and don't always need a man in their life. Hitchcock eventually used these
women to further push the ideas that conformed what society of the time really
wanted to hear. Yet he did ultimately accomplish this in a way that opposed
many. Knowing this we can see that Hitchcock also intended to challenge
society's thinking but achieve this in a way where his film's morals a still
accepted. As he did exactly this we can see that on a minor scale Hitchcock
achieved his intentions of his sexist beliefs, but also challenged society as a
whole to see women as something more than just an object.
Good grief, how dare a man save a woman he loves/cares about from certain death? I think it's extremely ridiculous to imply that is a part of sexist/misogynistic themes.
ReplyDeleteThat's not to say society was different in the 60s towards women. It's just almost infuriating, to be honest, how every "damsel in distress" trope in old movies gets highlighted way more than the actual independence and bravery from the character.
Women are physically weaker and vulnerable while men possess more strength and energy for battles, it's a fact, that's why it makes the most sense to have situations where they come to rescue the women in danger. In this context, Lila just saw a lady's corpse and next thing she sees is Norman wearing said lady's clothes about to knife her, what was she supposed to do on her own? I cannot imagine a better climax that treated her more "equality" to avoid the idea that women need a man to be saved.
*equally
Delete